Hyper Parents and Coddled Kids

Last night, CBC Television ran the documentary Hyper Parents and Coddled Kids (you can watch online if you’re in Canada). As the title suggests, it’s a look at the relatively recent trend in “helicopter parenting”, although I prefer the Swedish term discussed on the show: curling parents (they sweep all obstacles out of the way). The general thrust of the show was that this over-attentive parenting style is  Bad Thing as it leaves children anxious and ill-prepared for adult life.

It’s also fairly one-sided in that the viewer is presented with extreme examples of this trend, such as a mother spending $4000 on her daughter’s first birthday. “It’s a major achievement,” she argues. Or the parents who try to get their children into exclusive $1200 per month pre-schools from the moment they’re conceived, just to give them that advantage. Or the overly-scheduled children who’ve never just played freely. Or the tales of employers having parents negotiate their child’s salary. Finally, we are presented with the tale of a young woman who was raised in this style and despite being fired from several jobs for her attitude, launching a failed business that offered women massages and daily affirmations, declaring bankruptcy, all before she hits thirty,  still manages to keep her sense of entitlement and lack of personal accountability.

What you don’t hear is any sense of justification from these parents as to why they’ve chosen this path. Is this worse than the detached parenting styles of previous generations? Not that it should be an either/or question but there’s usually some kind of motivation for this sort of thing and perhaps when they reflect on their own childhood, there’s much they want to do differently.

I do agree with the points the documentary was making, in a general way. Kids’ lives do seem over-scheduled these days. Nobody seems to just send their kids out to play anymore. Playdates must be arranged. If a child kicks a ball for fun, she’s put on the soccer team.

I’m a big fan of Free Range Kids, a blog where the writer often asks why we’ve become obsessed with this perceived constant danger to our kids. I sometimes wonder if we’re so protective of children because we simply don’t trust ourselves to take the leash off once in a while. While our parents were content to send us out of the house until supper time, we think if we did the same thing, we’d do it wrong somehow and something bad would happen.

Of course, there will always be a balance between being involved in your child’s life and allowing them to fail on their own so that they can learn. I don’t think that’s unique to any generation.

The documentary also pointed out that the hyper-parenting trend is something that goes on among the middle t0 upper-classes. Many of the things parents are shown doing in this documentary simply aren’t options for us because we couldn’t afford it. In other words, spending half my take-home pay for daycare just isn’t going to happen. But I wonder if money weren’t an object, would I be much different?


3 thoughts on “Hyper Parents and Coddled Kids

  1. The documentary did hit the conflict with schools right on the head though. There are unrealistic expectations imposed by some parents on teachers. I get emails from parents at 11pm sometimes expecting an immediate response. There is an eagerness to keep kids from avoiding taking responsibility for the consequences of their actions, and expectations that you will cater to every individual person’s specialness. There is a culture of entitlement right now, and it’s extremely frustrating.

  2. I have witnessed parents doing anything to keep their kids from the natural consequences of their actions. When we don’t let our kids experience the small consequences, they learn their parents will get them out of any trouble.

    However, it isn’t over involvement which has caused this crisis, IMHO, it is really under involvement. Parent(s) work all day, come home tired, send their kids to their rooms to watch their own TVs and play their video games…alone, and then they can’t understand why they get into trouble, have no social skills and are failing in school.

  3. My sister is director of advising at Depaul and she was telling us over Christmas that many parents choose the classes for the kids. The kids don’t even know their access code since their mothers do it for them. Plus some grad students still come to their advising meetings with their parents. And the parents do all the talking.

    As far as education, I don’t see a problem with sending the kids to a good school if it can be afforded. Though I think that good schools should not be a privilege of the rich. Sending the kids to a good school and letting them be is one thing. Stalking and controlling their environment is another.

    Finding that balance between being active in their lives and letting them roam free seems to be ongoing and not always easy. Sometimes you find yourself not active enough and sometimes too protective. I think as long as you’re cognizant of it and continually correcting yourself, they should be fine. But letting go can be quite difficult at times.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s