<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Read</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/</link>
	<description>Keep calm and carry on.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/#comment-6003</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/?p=1702#comment-6003</guid>
		<description>Underlines are supposed to indicate the ones I really liked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underlines are supposed to indicate the ones I really liked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glacia</title>
		<link>http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/#comment-6002</link>
		<dc:creator>Glacia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/?p=1702#comment-6002</guid>
		<description>I got ot ask...why the underlines?  I assume the underlines were for books you want to read, but then you have the bolded books underlined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got ot ask&#8230;why the underlines?  I assume the underlines were for books you want to read, but then you have the bolded books underlined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Necromancer</title>
		<link>http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/#comment-6000</link>
		<dc:creator>The Necromancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/?p=1702#comment-6000</guid>
		<description>That Dan Brown book worms its way onto a lot of these lists. Diabolical. And for some reason Shakespeare is mentioned twice. With a couple of minor variations, I&#039;ve read most of the books you&#039;ve highlighted. As to most of the rest, they belong on another list: &lt;i&gt;100 Classics Everybody Knows the Title and Story of But Rarely Ever Reads&lt;/i&gt;. &#039;Nuff said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Dan Brown book worms its way onto a lot of these lists. Diabolical. And for some reason Shakespeare is mentioned twice. With a couple of minor variations, I&#8217;ve read most of the books you&#8217;ve highlighted. As to most of the rest, they belong on another list: <i>100 Classics Everybody Knows the Title and Story of But Rarely Ever Reads</i>. &#8216;Nuff said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mare</title>
		<link>http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/#comment-5995</link>
		<dc:creator>Mare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/?p=1702#comment-5995</guid>
		<description>That would be because The Da Vinci Code was shite.  You know that there are Da Vinci Code tours of Paris now, right?  SO LAME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be because The Da Vinci Code was shite.  You know that there are Da Vinci Code tours of Paris now, right?  SO LAME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/#comment-5994</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/?p=1702#comment-5994</guid>
		<description>The list was defintitely drawn up by popular vote and is not considered in any way authoritative. I don&#039;t know what it means, other than it concludes positively that I have read a lot of stuff that other people have read but I have not read some other stuff that other people have also read.

Oh, and I hated the Da Vinci Code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The list was defintitely drawn up by popular vote and is not considered in any way authoritative. I don&#8217;t know what it means, other than it concludes positively that I have read a lot of stuff that other people have read but I have not read some other stuff that other people have also read.</p>
<p>Oh, and I hated the Da Vinci Code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/#comment-5993</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/?p=1702#comment-5993</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t tabulated yet, so I don&#039;t know my score, but oh, I so agree about your Dan Brown comments.  It is also beyond me why &quot;The Time Traveler&#039;s Wife&quot; is on the list.  I don&#039;t know if they decided it was artistic on the merits of how bizarre it was, or what.  But I&#039;m not really convinced that the mere fact of being inaccessibly strange should really mean anything.  

Now, &quot;Count of Monte Cristo.&quot;  That&#039;s quality.  

Hi, by the way!  I found you linked from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lambic.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/06/a-book-meme/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lambic&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tabulated yet, so I don&#8217;t know my score, but oh, I so agree about your Dan Brown comments.  It is also beyond me why &#8220;The Time Traveler&#8217;s Wife&#8221; is on the list.  I don&#8217;t know if they decided it was artistic on the merits of how bizarre it was, or what.  But I&#8217;m not really convinced that the mere fact of being inaccessibly strange should really mean anything.  </p>
<p>Now, &#8220;Count of Monte Cristo.&#8221;  That&#8217;s quality.  </p>
<p>Hi, by the way!  I found you linked from <a href="http://www.lambic.co.uk/blog/archives/2008/06/a-book-meme/" rel="nofollow">Lambic</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mare</title>
		<link>http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/the-big-read/#comment-5992</link>
		<dc:creator>Mare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shatnerian.wordpress.com/?p=1702#comment-5992</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I scored 71 on the strength of an English degree and a childhood with my nose in a book.  I&#039;d like to say I&#039;m going to get through the 29 I&#039;m short, but they include the Complete Works of Shakespeare (though I have read a bit, I have not read all - Troilus and Cressida, for instance, or The Two Gentlemen of Verona, or most of the Histories); and Ulysses.  The thought of tackling Ulysses fills me with anxiety.  Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man was hard enough.  And so... and so.

I was very surprised not to see The English Patient or In the Skin of a Lion; or Life of Pi.

Additionally, Carlos Ruiz Zafon&#039;s The Shadow of the Wind is an excellent read if you&#039;re looking for something gothic.  Also recommend The Thirteenth Tale for the same purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I scored 71 on the strength of an English degree and a childhood with my nose in a book.  I&#8217;d like to say I&#8217;m going to get through the 29 I&#8217;m short, but they include the Complete Works of Shakespeare (though I have read a bit, I have not read all &#8211; Troilus and Cressida, for instance, or The Two Gentlemen of Verona, or most of the Histories); and Ulysses.  The thought of tackling Ulysses fills me with anxiety.  Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man was hard enough.  And so&#8230; and so.</p>
<p>I was very surprised not to see The English Patient or In the Skin of a Lion; or Life of Pi.</p>
<p>Additionally, Carlos Ruiz Zafon&#8217;s The Shadow of the Wind is an excellent read if you&#8217;re looking for something gothic.  Also recommend The Thirteenth Tale for the same purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
